BROCK, Chief Judge.
The Bureau contends that the Commissioner's initial disapproval of the rates proposed by its 21 July 1975 filing was invalid because the Commissioner failed to comply with hearing requirement of G.S. 58-27.2(a), and, consequently, the proposed rates were "deemed approved" upon the Commissioner's failure to disapprove them "in writing within 60 days after submission" according to G.S. 58-131.1.
The apparent conflict between the hearing requirement...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.