1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 229 S.E.2d
  5. 229 S.E.2d 256 (1976)
 

STATE v. HARVEY

No. 762SC333.

229 S.E.2d 256 (1976)

STATE of North Carolina v. Nicholo HARVEY.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

November 3, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen. John R. B. Matthis, Raleigh, for the State.

Carter, Archie & Grimes by Samuel G. Grimes, Washington, for defendant.

MARTIN, Judge.

Defendant contends the court erred in allowing the in-court identification of the defendant by Mr. Hodges.

Before Hodges' identification testimony was admitted in evidence, a voir dire hearing was held to determine its admissibility. State v. Accor and State v. Moore, 277 N.C. 65, 175 S.E.2d 583 (1970). On voir dire the State offered evidence tending to show that Hodges observed defendant for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases