BEATTIE v. BD. OF PAROLE


39 N.Y.2d 445 (1976)

In the Matter of Gregory Beattie, Respondent, v. New York State Board of Parole, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided April 27, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (David L. Birch and Samuel A. Hirshowitz of counsel), for appellant.

Joel H. Golub, William E. Hellerstein and Donald H. Zuckerman for respondent.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in Per Curiam opinion.


Per Curiam.

The issue is whether a parolee held on an unrelated criminal charge is entitled to a prompt final revocation hearing. The answer is that he is.

Preliminarily, the appeal, as has been suggested, should not be dismissed for mootness in view of relator's subsequent conviction of the crime for which he had been charged. Even if the issue be mooted, the appeal should not be dismissed as

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases