1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 86 Wn.2d
  5. 86 Wn.2d 395 (1976)
 

BITTS, INC. v. SEATTLE

No. 43717.

86 Wn.2d 395 (1976)

544 P.2d 1242

BITTS, INC., ET AL, Appellants, v. THE CITY OF SEATTLE, ET AL, Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

January 22, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William S. Howard and James V. Grubb (Arthur M. Schwartz, of counsel), for appellants.

John P. Harris, Corporation Counsel, by J. Roger Nowell, Assistant, for respondents.

WRIGHT, J.

This is an action for a declaratory judgment under RCW 7.24.020 seeking to have chapter 10.98 of the Seattle city code declared unconstitutional. Plaintiffs-appellants also attack certain other sections of the city code as the same affect the matters herein discussed.

Appellants are the operators of businesses in Seattle which are known as "panoram" or "peep" shows. The businesses of all of the appellants are substantially the same; a customer goes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases