Marvin MANDEL, Governor of the State of Maryland, et al.
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE, an agency of the United States of America, et al.
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, a Municipal Corporation, et al.
v.
F. David MATHEWS, Individually and as Secretary of the United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare, et al.
United States District Court, D. Maryland.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 20, 1976.
April 20, 1976.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Francis B. Burch, Atty. Gen. of Maryland, Henry R. Lord, Deputy Atty. Gen., David H. Feldman, Walter G. Lohr, Jr., and George A. Nilson, Asst. Attys. Gen., Baltimore, Md., for plaintiffs, with the exception of Bd. of Trustees of the Community College of Baltimore, in Civ. A. No. N-76-1.
Benjamin L. Brown, City Sol. of Baltimore City, and William Hughes, Chief Sol., Baltimore, Md., for plaintiff Bd. of Trustees of the Community College of Baltimore in Civ. A. No. N-76-1 and for plaintiffs in Civ. A. No. N-76-23.
Ambrose T. Hartman, Deputy City Sol., Blanche G. Wahl, Sp. Asst. City Sol., Baltimore, Md., for plaintiff Bd. of Trustees of the Community College of Baltimore in Civ. A. No. N-76-1.
J. Stanley Pottinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Civil Rights Div., U. S. Dept. of Justice, Alexander C. Ross, Leigh M. Manasevit, Atty., Civ. Rights Div., Washington, D. C., for defendants in Civ. A. Nos. N-76-1 and N-76-23.
Teresa T. Milton, Atty., Civ. Rights Div., Washington, D. C., for defendants in Civ. A. No. N-76-1.
Elise J. Mason, Asst. City Sol., and E. Stephen Derby and Edward M. Norton, Jr., Baltimore, Md. (William L. Marbury, Baltimore, Md., of counsel), for plaintiffs in Civ. A. No. N-76-23.
Frank K. Krueger, Jr., Atty., Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare, Washington, D. C., of counsel, for defendants in Civ. A. No. N-76-23.
United States District Court, D. Maryland.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NORTHROP, Chief Judge.
Before this Court are defendants' motions, pursuant to Rule 62(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to stay the judgments entered by this Court on March 9, 1976, and March 12, 1976, pending appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Defendants' motions and joint memorandum assert that stays should be granted under the rationale of Long v. Robinson,432 F...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
