1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Super.
  4. 239 Pa.Super.
  5. 239 Pa.Super. 229 (1976)
 

MERKLIN v. PHILA. SUB. WTR. CO.

239 Pa.Super. 229 (1976)

Merklin, et al. Appellants, v. Philadelphia Suburban Water Company et al.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

March 29, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew Elash, with him Galen D. Hawk, Alexander B. Giacobetti, and Wright, Spencer, Manning & Sagendorph, and Richter, Syken, Ross & Levant, for appellants.

Joseph J. Murphy, with him Robert J. Murphy, Thomas W. Murphy, and Murphy, Murphy & Murphy, for appellees.

Before WATKINS, P.J., JACOBS, HOFFMAN, CERCONE, PRICE, VAN DER VOORT, and SPAETH, JJ.

OPINION BY PRICE, J., March 29, 1976:

Appellants in this case contend that it was error for the court en banc to grant a compulsory non-suit after the trial judge had declared a mistrial. For the reasons which follow, we agree, and grant appellants a new trial.

This appeal arises from the trial of a motor vehicle collision case. On the second day of trial a colloquy took place between the respective attorneys and the judge, wherein counsel for the appellees...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases