1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 333 So.2d
  5. 333 So.2d 96 (1976)
 

HAMBRICK v. JACKSON

No. X-357.

333 So.2d 96 (1976)

Mary R. HAMBRICK and South Carolina Insurance Company, Inc., a Corporation, Appellants, v. Ethel JACKSON and Johnny M. Jackson, Her Husband, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 10, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John I. Todd, Jr., Jacksonville, for appellants.

George L. Proctor, of Smith & Proctor Jacksonville, for appellees.

PER CURIAM

The only point on appeal that merits discussion is appellants' contention that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury as to the defense of assumption of risk. Our sister court has held that the doctrine of assumption of risk is a valid defense. Dorta v. Blackburn, 302 So.2d 450 (Fla.App. 3rd, 1974). This court held to the contrary in Parker v. Maule Industries, Inc., 321...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases