1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 73 Wis.2d
  5. 73 Wis.2d 337 (1976)
 

STATE v. KLINE

No. 75-142-CR.

73 Wis.2d 337 (1976)

243 N.W.2d 519

STATE, Respondent, v. KLINE, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 30, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs and oral argument by James A. Hanley of Milwaukee.

For the respondent the cause was argued by Marguerite M. Moeller, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general.

PER CURIAM.

The court is equally divided on the question of whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, Mr. Chief Justice BEILFUSS, Mr. Justice HEFFERNAN, and Mr. Justice DAY being of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed, and Mr. Justice HANLEY, Mr. Justice CONNOR T. HANSEN, and Mr. Justice ROBERT W. HANSEN being of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed. The judgment appealed from is affirmed under the rule.

Judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases