1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Super.
  4. 239 Pa.Super.
  5. 239 Pa.Super. 165 (1976)
 

WRIGHT v. SEPTA, et al.

239 Pa.Super. 165 (1976)

Wright, Appellant, v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority et al.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

March 29, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis X. Nolan, with him Donsky, Katz, Levin and Dashevsky, for appellant.

Robert J. Spiegel, for appellee, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority.

Before WATKINS, P.J., JACOBS, HOFFMAN, CERCONE, PRICE, VAN DER VOORT, and SPAETH, JJ.

OPINION BY CERCONE, J., March 29, 1976:

The verdict-winner and plaintiff below, James Wright, brings this appeal challenging the propriety of the lower court's ordering of a trial de novo upon the motion of the defendant, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA). Appellant's cause of action, which arose from a collision between one of defendant's buses on which he was a passenger, and a

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases