CURTIS v. RED. AUTH., CITY OF PHILA. ET AL.

Nos. 140 C.D. 1976 and 2 T.D. 1976.

27 Pa.Commw. 360 (1976)

Dewey Lee Curtis v. Redevelopment Authority of the City of Philadelphia, William D. Glockner and Winifred M. Glockner. Dewey Lee Curtis, Appellant. Dewey Lee Curtis v. Redevelopment Authority of the City of Philadelphia, William D. Glockner and Winifred M. Glockner. Redevelopment Authority of the City of Philadelphia, Appellant.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

December 7, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arnold H. Rosenberg, with him David R. Rosenfeld, and Charen, Palitz and Rosenberg, for Curtis.

David S. Winston, Solicitor, with him Peter A. Galante, General Counsel, for Redevelopment Authority of the City of Philadelphia.

Samuel Rappaport, with him Rappaport & Furman, for Glockner.

Argued October 8, 1976, before Judges MENCER, ROGERS and BLATT, sitting as a panel of three.


OPINION BY JUDGE MENCER, December 7, 1976:

This case arises on cross appeals brought by the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Philadelphia (Authority) and William D. and Winifred M. Glockner on one side and Dewey Lee Curtis on the other. Curtis commenced this action by bringing a suit in equity against the Glockners and the Authority, seeking to have the Glockners' deed to property located at 220 Delancey Street reformed to reflect the reservation of an easement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases