1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 140 N.J.
  5. 140 N.J. Super. 247 (1976)
 

181 INCORPORATED v. SALEM CTY. PLANNING BD.

140 N.J. Super. 247 (1976)

356 A.2d 34

181 INCORPORATED, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, OAKFORD W. ACTON, JR., AND LAWRENCE W. POINT. PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. THE SALEM COUNTY PLANNING BOARD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND THE BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF SALEM, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 30, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Norman Telsey argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Lawrence W. Point argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Acton & Point, attorneys).

Before Judges HALPERN, CRANE and MICHELS.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm that portion of the summary judgment of the Law Division reversing the action of defendant Salem County Planning Board (planning board) which compelled plaintiff 181 Incorporated to dedicate to Salem County (county) a portion of its land abutting a county road as a condition predecent to approval of a site plan for the construction of a law office, substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Miller. 181 Incorporated v. Salem Cty. Planning...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases