1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 62 Cal.App.3d
  5. 62 Cal.App.3d 310 (1976)
 

CAIN v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.

Docket No. 37869.

62 Cal.App.3d 310 (1976)

132 Cal. Rptr. 860

ELAINE CAIN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

September 27, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Bishop & Barry and Neil R. Bardack for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Stone, O'Brien & Hammond, James D. Hammond and James A. Murphy for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

ELKINGTON, J.

On this appeal we are called upon to determine the appropriate statute of limitations, and the point at which it starts running, on an action for damages for violation of one's right to privacy. The latter question appears to be one of first impression.

Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company ("State Farm") had insured the automobile of plaintiff Bing Woo Jew ("Bing"). While occupied...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases