1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 227 S.E.2d
  5. 227 S.E.2d 131 (1976)
 

STOKLEY v. STOKLEY

No. 751DC1023.

227 S.E.2d 131 (1976)

30 N.C. App. 351

Charles Walter STOKLEY, Plaintiff, v. Mary Elizabeth Bray STOKLEY, Defendant. Mary Elizabeth Bray STOKLEY, Petitioner, v. Lennie L. HUGHES, Administrator de bonis non of the Estate of Charles Walter Stokley, Respondent, and Nancy M. Jernigan, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

August 4, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jennette, Morrison & Austin, by C. Glenn Austin, Twiford, Abbott, Seawell, Trimpi & Thompson, by C. Everett Thompson, Elizabeth City, for petitioner.

White, Hall, Mullen & Brumsey, by John H. Hall, Jr., Elizabeth City, for respondent Nancy M. Jernigan.

MARTIN, Judge.

The motion in the cause was made pursuant to Rule 60(b)(3), (4), and (6), Rules of Civil Procedure. The rule in pertinent part reads as follows:

"(b) Mistakes; Inadvertence; Excusable Neglect; Newly Discovered Evidence; Fraud, etc. On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or his legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (3) Fraud (whether heretofore...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases