SCHWEIZER v. ELOX DIV. OF COLT INDUSTRIES


70 N.J. 280 (1976)

359 A.2d 857

HOWARD SCHWEIZER, PLAINTIFF, v. ELOX DIVISION OF COLT INDUSTRIES, DEFENDANTS-THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANT. STANLEY J. KRAWCZUK AND CAROLYN KRAWCZUK, PLAINTIFFS, v. ELOX DIVISION OF COLT INDUSTRIES, DEFENDANT-THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANT. LINDA BARTON, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM, ETC., PLAINTIFF, v. ELOX DIVISION OF COLT INDUSTRIES, DEFENDANT-THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY DEFENDANT-THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SENTRY INSURANCE COMPANY, STATUTORY SUBROGEE OF METEM CORPORATION, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 11, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Bernard F. Conway argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Conway & Belsole, attorneys; Mr. E. Neal Zimmermann on the brief).

Mr. John J. Ronca argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Ronca & McDonald, attorneys).


The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, P.J.A.D., Temporarily Assigned.

We are asked on this appeal to alter the construction of the employer-subrogation provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act (N.J.S.A. 34:15-40) from that consistently understood and practically applied in this State by those concerned therewith over the years.

The act provides, expressly and without qualification, that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases