1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 241 N.W.2d
  5. 241 N.W.2d 101 (1976)
 

STATE v. NACE

No. 45443.

241 N.W.2d 101 (1976)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Scott William NACE, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

April 9, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Paul Jones, Public Defender, R. James McNulty, Asst., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Warren Spannaus, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Keith M. Brownell, County Atty., Richard C. Hansen, Asst. County Atty., Duluth, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant contends on this appeal from judgment of conviction of sale of a controlled substance1 (marijuana) that (1) the record does not contain a sufficient basis for concluding (a) that the plea was knowingly and intelligently entered, or (b) that there was a factual basis for it; and (2) the record compels the conclusion that his counsel did not provide adequate representation. We affirm.

Defendant's contention...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases