RILEY v. CINCINNATI

No. 75-72.

46 Ohio St. 2d 287 (1976)

RILEY, APPELLEE, v. CITY OF CINCINNATI, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 26, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Lindhorst & Dreidame and Mr. Leo J. Breslin, for appellee.

Mr. Thomas A. Luebbers, city solicitor, and Mr. Timothy L. Bouscaren, for appellant.


CELEBREZZE, J.

Appellant presents for its main objection to the judgment of the lower courts the legal question of the applicability of the covenant not to sue as it relates to a party in its position. The city maintains that if there was any duty owing to the appellee by it that it was at best secondary to that of the three defendants dismissed as a result of the execution of said covenant. Reliance upon this covenant by the appellant is misplaced, not only for the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases