1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 32 Md.
  5. 32 Md. App. 1 (1976)
 

ROE v. CITIZENS NAT'L BANK

No. 1063 September Term, 1975.

32 Md. App. 1 (1976)

358 A.2d 267

G. HOWARD ROE ET UX. v. THE CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

Decided June 9, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herbert J. Hirsch for appellants.

Paul S. Beatty, with whom were Isaac Hecht, Benjamin S. Cohen and Hecht & Beatty on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before LOWE, MELVIN and MASON, JJ.

LOWE, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

The issue at the root of this controversy appears deceptively simple. It is, in essence, whether fewer than all of the joint obligors of a loan guarantee may be released, leaving the unreleased obligors responsible for the unpaid portion of the loan.

The record shows that the Levys1 and the Roes2 jointly and severally...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases