Per Curiam.
The central issue presented is whether the commission erred in determining that a 7.14 percent rate of return was fair and reasonable. Specifically, appellant contends that the methods used to arrive at this rate were improper.
In finding that a 7.14 percent rate of return was allowable, the commission noted the recommendations of the witnesses, but found further analysis of their positions to be unnecessary. Instead, it relied primarily...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
