1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 59 Cal.App.3d
  5. 59 Cal.App.3d 262 (1976)
 

SHAW, HOOKER & CO. v. HAISMAN

Docket No. 37605.

59 Cal.App.3d 262 (1976)

130 Cal. Rptr. 528

SHAW, HOOKER & COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ROBERT L. HAISMAN, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

June 18, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Layman & Lempert and Arthur J. Lempert for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Howard S. Burnside for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

BRAY, J.*

Plaintiff appeals from the order of the San Francisco Superior Court granting defendant's motion to quash the writ of attachment.

ISSUE PRESENTED

Respondent was not engaged in a trade or business and hence the trial court properly quashed the writ of attachment upon his real property.

RECORD

On March...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases