1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 58 Cal.App.3d
  5. 58 Cal.App.3d 263 (1976)
 

ADV. MED. DIAGNOSTIC LAB. v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Docket No. 46386.

58 Cal.App.3d 263 (1976)

129 Cal. Rptr. 723

ADVANCE MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORIES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents; BIO-SCIENCE LABORATORIES et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

May 14, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Fierstein, Sturman & Schulman, Fierstein & Sturman, Mark I. Rosenberg and Harvey Fierstein for Plaintiff and Appellant.

John H. Larson, County Counsel, and Raymond G. Fortner, Jr., Deputy County Counsel, for Defendants and Respondents.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, G. Edward Fitzgerald. R. Randall Huff, Adelman & Schwartz and Albert L. Schwartz for Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

OPINION

ROTH, P.J.

Respondent H.E. Davis (Davis) purchasing agent for respondent County of Los Angeles (County) executed purchase agreements (agreements) with respondents Bio-Science Laboratories (Bio-Science) and Biochemical Procedures (Biochemical), who are real parties in interest (RPIs). Appellant, Advance Medical Diagnostic Laboratories (AMDL), in its capacity as a taxpayer (Code Civ. Proc. § 526a), sought a declaration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases