MILLER v. ESTATE OF KAHN


140 N.J. Super. 177 (1976)

355 A.2d 702

CORINNE MILLER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ESTATE OF LOUIS KAHN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 9, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Bruce M. Pitman argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Diamond, Grossman, Pitman, Udine & Anzaldi, attorneys).

Mr. Harold G. Cohen argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys).

Before Judges FRITZ, SEIDMAN and MILMED.


The opinion of the court was delivered by FRITZ, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying her motion to set aside a dismissal previously entered upon her stipulation. While the trial judge did not expressly say so, it is clear that he refused to restore the matter solely because of his conviction that the statute of limitations had run. An understanding of the delicate policy questions involved requires reference to the procedural facts, which do not appear...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases