1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 228 S.E.2d
  5. 228 S.E.2d 85 (1976)
 

STATE v. CASH

No. 7610SC289.

228 S.E.2d 85 (1976)

30 N.C. App. 677

STATE of North Carolina v. William Yancey CASH.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

September 15, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Associate Attys. Norma S. Harrell and William H. Guy, Raleigh, for the State.

C. Diederich Heidgerd and Frederic E. Toms, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant.

ARNOLD, Judge.

We reject appellant's position that the superior court hearing was not de novo as required by G.S. 15-200.1 and G.S. 7-271(b). He contends that the superior court hearing was merely a review of the district court hearing. If the hearing were not de novo then the case would have to be remanded. State v. Thompson, 244 N.C. 282, 93 S.E.2d 158 (1956).

This case...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases