1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 278 Md.
  5. 278 Md. 34 (1976)
 

DIX v. SPAMPINATO

[No. 104, September Term, 1975.]

278 Md. 34 (1976)

358 A.2d 237

DIX, ETC. ET AL. v. SPAMPINATO ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Motion for reconsideration filed June 23, 1976.

denied July 12, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis N. Iglehart, with whom was Michael J. Lambros on the brief, for appellants.

James E. Gray for Patricia Mae Spampinato, one of appellees. William A. Hegarty for Jeanette Horak, other appellee.

The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES, LEVINE, ELDRIDGE andO'DONNELL, JJ.

SINGLEY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. LEVINE and ELDRIDGE, JJ., dissent and ELDRIDGE, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which LEVINE, J., concurs at page 39 infra.

We granted certiorari in this case in order that we might consider the result reached by the Court of Special Appeals in Dix v. Spampinato, 28 Md.App. 81, 344 A.2d 155 (1975), a

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases