DANVILLE FIRE PROTECTION DIST. v. DUFFEL FINANCIAL

Docket No. 36327.

58 Cal.App.3d 241 (1976)

129 Cal. Rptr. 882

DANVILLE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DUFFEL FINANCIAL AND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents; PROSPECT FARMS, Defendant and Appellant; ASSOCIATED HOME BUILDERS OF THE GREATER EASTBAY, INC., Intervener and Respondent. LANDPAC ENTERPRISES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DANVILLE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

May 14, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Cowan & Henze and Douglas G. Cowan for Plaintiff and Appellant and Defendant and Appellant Danville Fire Protection District.

Tinning & DeLap. Robert T. Eshleman and Jay P. Sanders for Defendants and Respondents, for Defendant and Appellant Prospect Farms and for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Brucher & Shiver and Joseph D. Joiner for Intervener and Respondent.


OPINION

TAYLOR, P.J.

On this appeal by the Danville Fire Protection District from a judgment after a court trial in two consolidated matters,1 the main question is whether the district was entitled to enforce against the builders the heat, smoke and sprinkler system requirements of its Ordinance No. 5 that are more stringent than those of the Uniform Building Code adopted by the county pursuant to the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases