JACKSON v. GOODMAN

Docket No. 23669.

69 Mich. App. 225 (1976)

244 N.W.2d 423

JACKSON v. GOODMAN

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided May 27, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig, Farber & Downs, P.C., for plaintiff.

Bornstein & Wishnow, for defendant.

Before: D.E. HOLBROOK, Jr., P.J., and McGREGOR and N.J. KAUFMAN, JJ.


N.J. KAUFMAN, J.

The facts are as stated by the dissent. We find that the trial court improperly granted a judgment notwithstanding the verdict because there was sufficient evidence to present jury questions concerning the existence of a reward1 and the presence of either inherent authority or ratification.

The law governing rewards and the rules defining implied authority are straightforward. It is difficult, however, to apply...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases