STATE v. ACKLIN


171 Conn. 105 (1976)

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. PAUL ACKLIN STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. CURTIS WRIGHT

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released May 25, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Corradino, for the appellant (defendant Paul Acklin).

Max F. Brunswick, for the appellant (defendant Curtis Wright).

Ernest J. Diette, Jr., assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, was Arnold Markle, state's attorney, for the appellee (state).

HOUSE, C. J., LOISELLE, BOGDANSKI, LONGO and BARBER, JS.


BARBER, J.

The defendants in these two cases were tried together to a jury and found guilty of the crimes of conspiracy to commit robbery in the first degree, in violation of § 53a-48 of the General Statutes, robbery in the first degree, in violation of § 53a-134 (a) (2) of the General Statutes, and having a weapon in a motor vehicle, in violation of § 29-28 of the General Statutes. Although all the claims presented in their separate appeals are not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases