STERN, J.
The complaint in this case claimed that "the defendant showed and commercialized the film of * * * [plaintiff's] act without his consent and such conduct by the defendant was unlawful appropriation of plaintiff's professional property." Appropriation is a well-recognized branch of the more general tort of interference with the right of privacy. In Housh v. Peth (1956),
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.