1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 70 N.J.
  5. 70 N.J. 196 (1976)
 

STATE v. SZIMA

70 N.J. 196 (1976)

358 A.2d 773

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOSEPH G. SZIMA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 17, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Matthew P. Boylan, Director, Division of Criminal Justice, argued the cause for appellant (Ms. Lois De Julio and Mr. Daniel Louis Grossman, Deputy Attorneys General, of counsel and on the brief; Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Mr. Harold Goldman argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Goldman, Carlet, Garrison & Bertoni, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by SULLIVAN, J.

Defendant was convicted of bookmaking, working for a lottery and maintaining a gambling resort, violations of N.J.S.A. 2A:121-3, 3(a) and 3(c) respectively. The aggregate sentence imposed was not less than one year nor more than 15 months to be served in State Prison.

The Appellate Division, in an opinion reported at 133 N.J.Super. 469...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases