RODD v. W. H. KING DRUG CO.

No. 763SC237.

228 S.E.2d 35 (1976)

30 N.C. App. 564

June RODD, T/A the Studio of Havelock v. W. H. KING DRUG COMPANY.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

September 1, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ward, Tucker, Ward & Smith, P. A. by David L. Ward, Jr., and Thomas R. Crawford, New Bern, for plaintiff-appellee.

Jacob W. Todd, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant.


CLARK, Judge.

Since all of the evidence supports the finding by the jury that there was a breach of warranty in that there was a defect in the color enlarger purchased by plaintiff from defendant for use in her commercial photography business, we find that the primary question before this Court relates to damages. The defendant assigns error in the charge of the court on the damage issue and the denial of the defendant's motion to set aside the verdict.

In...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases