1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 26 Ariz.
  5. 26 Ariz. App. 236 (1976)
 

HULS v. ARIZ. ST. BD. OF OSTEOPATHIC EXAM. IN M.

No. 1 CA-CIV 2760.

26 Ariz. App. 236 (1976)

547 P.2d 507

William J. HULS, D.O., Appellant, v. ARIZONA STATE BOARD OF OSTEOPATHIC EXAMINERS IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

March 30, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wade E. Church, Phoenix, for appellant.

Bruce E. Babbitt, Atty. Gen. by Nicholas C. Guttilla and Thomas M. Rogers, Asst. Attys. Gen., Phoenix, for appellee.

OPINION

JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.

The basic dispute raised by this appeal centers around advances made by a profession whose beginning lay primarily in the fingers and the hands of its practitioners.

Appellant, William J. Huls, is a duly licensed doctor of osteopathy. At the time of the hearing complained of in this matter, he was 78 years old and had actively practiced his profession for 47 years. On November 2, 1972, the appellee, Arizona Board...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases