1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 26 Ariz.
  5. 26 Ariz. App. 235 (1976)
 

ROMERO v. DeCONCINI McDONALD & BRAMMER

No. 2 CA-CIV 2021.

26 Ariz. App. 235 (1976)

547 P.2d 506

Richard R.A. ROMERO and Molly M. Romero, husband and wife, Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. DeCONCINI McDONALD & BRAMMER, P.C., Appellee and Cross-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

March 26, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clay G. Diamos, Tucson, for appellants and cross-appellees.

DeConcini McDonald Brammer & Yetwin, P.C., by John W. Lovell, Tucson, for appellee and cross-appellant.

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

Appellee was awarded judgment against the appellants in the sum of $12,571.60 for attorneys' fees. Appellants paid appellee the sum of $11,200 and a satisfaction of judgment was entered by appellee. In this appeal appellants contend that there was insufficient evidence to support the judgment in that there was no showing that they personally promised to pay the attorneys' fees.

Appellee cross-appeals, contending the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases