1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 74 Wis.2d
  5. 74 Wis.2d 176 (1976)
 

JAMESON v. STATE

No. 75-497-CR.

74 Wis.2d 176 (1976)

246 N.W.2d 541

JAMESON, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided November 3, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by Howard B. Eisenberg, state public defender.

For the defendant in error there was a brief by Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and Thomas J. Balistreri, assistant attorney general.

ROBERT W. HANSEN, J.

The defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction on the criminal charge of removing encumbered property with intent to defraud.1a

[1-3] In testing the sufficiency of the evidence in a criminal trial to the court, findings of the trial court are not to be disturbed on appeal unless they are contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases