1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 114 Ariz.
  5. 114 Ariz. 132 (1976)
 

SANDOVAL v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N

No. 1 CA-IC 1498.

114 Ariz. 132 (1976)

559 P.2d 688

Ausbert S. SANDOVAL, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona, Respondent, Salt River Power District, Respondent Employer, Salt River Power District, Respondent Carrier.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C.

Rehearing Denied January 12, 1977.

Review Denied February 1, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thur, Preston & Hungerford by Calvin C. Thur, Scottsdale, for petitioner.

John H. Budd, Jr., Chief Counsel, The Industrial Commission of Arizona, Phoenix, for respondent.

John S. Schaper, Phoenix, for respondent employer and carrier.

OPINION

JACOBSON, Acting Presiding Judge.

On review of this Workmen's Compensation award several issues are presented: (1) Is the Notice of Claim Status void because the form contained printed language which stated that the employee "has returned to regular work without wage loss due to injury"1 which inaccurately described the claimant's actual situation? (2) Is the Industrial Commission's determination that the petitioner's condition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases