1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 59 Cal.App.3d
  5. 59 Cal.App.3d 175 (1976)
 

SUBRIAR v. CITY OF BAKERSFIELD

Docket No. 2433.

59 Cal.App.3d 175 (1976)

130 Cal. Rptr. 853

FRANK W. SUBRIAR et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

June 16, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Kenneth W. Hoagland, City Attorney, and Richard J. Oberholzer, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Appellants.

Sims & Solomon and Gabriel W. Solomon for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

CARKEET, J.*

This case arose out of the respondent Subriar's operating an ambulance business in the City of Bakersfield without first having obtained a certificate of convenience and necessity as required by chapter 7.62 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code. Respondent Subriar on two different occasions filed applications for obtaining a certificate. At the time of respondent's first application there...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases