Per Curiam.
Respondent argues that the complaint herein makes no specific averment that relator was indigent at the time the motion for a transcript was made. However, the uncontroverted facts set forth in this cause do not permit a judgment for respondent on that basis.
Respondent contends further that an appeal must be pending to require a transcript at state expense. However, this court has determined that an indigent is entitled to a transcript...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
