BILLINGSLEY v. ZICKERT

No. 151 (1974).

72 Wis.2d 156 (1976)

240 N.W.2d 375

BILLINGSLEY, Appellant, v. ZICKERT and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided April 7, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Johnson, Bieber & Swingen of Madison, and oral argument by Daniel G. Sandell.

For the respondents there was a brief by John Koeppl and Stafford, Rosenbaum, Reiser & Hansen of Madison, and oral argument by Mr. Koeppl.


HANLEY, J.

The issues presented are as follows:

1. Did the trial court commit error in ruling that as a matter of law the area surrounding the accident scene was a "business district"?

2. Did the trial court err in instructing the jury on the duty of an automobile operator to remain awake?

3. Did the trial court err in instructing the jury on the effects of intoxicating beverages?

4. Should a new trial be granted?

5. In recovering...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases