1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 114 Ariz.
  5. 114 Ariz. 107 (1976)
 

CITY OF TUCSON v. MILLS

No. 2 CA-CIV 2154.

114 Ariz. 107 (1976)

559 P.2d 663

The CITY OF TUCSON, the Civil Service Commission of the City of Tucson, Schuyler Lininger and Jane Doe Lininger, husband and wife, George Codd and Jane Doe Codd, husband and wife, Paul Miner in his Capacities as Secretary of the Civil Service Commission and Director of Personnel of the City of Tucson, William J. Gilkinson, Chief of Police of the City of Tucson, and Gene Reid, Director of Parks and Recreation, Appellants, v. Lennis J. MILLS, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

Rehearing Denied December 21, 1976.

Review Denied January 25, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James D. Webb, Tucson City Atty. by Thomas J. Wilson, Asst. City Atty., Tucson, for appellants.

Quigley & Quigley, P.C. by James E. Quigley, Tucson, for appellee.

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment ordering that the decision of the Civil Service Commission, upholding the suspension of appellee Mills, be set aside and that appellee be provided with his previously suspended credentials and be reinstated as an employee of the Parks and Recreation Department of the City of Tucson.

The facts of the case are as follows. Appellee, a duly qualified and permanent employee of the City of Tucson, was serving...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases