LONG v. LONG

No. 75-356.

45 Ohio St. 2d 165 (1976)

LONG ET AL., APPELLEES, v. LONG APPELLANT

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 25, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs, Brumbaugh, Engelken, Cox & Worster and A. Staley, for appellant.

Mr. Herbert W. Cox, for appellees.

Messrs. Spidel, Staley, Hole & Hanes and Mr. Hugh


CORRIGAN, J.

I.

The unique issue in this case concerns the nature of the interest remaining in the grantor, Henry Long, after the creation by deed of a fee tail estate which was conveyed by the grantor to his son "Jesse S. Long, and the children of his body begotten, and their heirs and assigns forever."

The parties agree that the estate created by the grantor was a fee tail. Pollock v. Speidel (1867), 17 Ohio St. 439.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases