1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 139 N.J.
  5. 139 N.J. Super. 66 (1976)
 

MIKITKA v. JOHNS-MANVILLE PRODUCTS CORP.

139 N.J. Super. 66 (1976)

352 A.2d 591

WINIFRED MIKITKA, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. JOHNS-MANVILLE PRODUCTS CORPORATION, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 16, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Edward W. Gorney argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Chase, Rzemieniewski & Gorney, attorneys).

Ms. Dorothy Dygas argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Wharton, Stewart & Davis, attorneys; Mr. Richard H. Thiele, Jr. and Ms. Joan L. Mott, on the brief).

Before Judges MATTHEWS, LORA and MORGAN.

PER CURIAM.

In this workmen's compensation case petitioner appeals from an order dismissing her claim petition for occupational disease on the ground that it was barred by the applicable period of limitation. N.J.S.A. 34:15-34.

Petitioner Winifred Mikitka was an employee of respondent Johns-Manville Products Corporation from April 9, 1956 until October 1970 when she retired. Several years before her retirement on March 31, 1967 she was awarded 7 1/2...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases