EGGE v. LANE COUNTY


548 P.2d 1356 (1976)

Vernon L. EGGE, Appellant, v. LANE COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Oregon, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 26, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laurence E. Thorp, Springfield, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Sanders, Lively & Wiswall, Springfield.

Richard Bryson, Eugene, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Calkins & Calkins and Bryson & Robert, Eugene.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and FORT and THORNTON, JJ.


FORT, Judge.

Plaintiff sued Lane County and six of its officers and employes for damages resulting from a wrongful injunction. The trial court sustained the defendants' demurrer to the complaint because it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Plaintiff appeals.

Recovery for damages resulting from a wrongful injunction normally is in the form of a claim against the obligors upon the bond which ORS 32.020 requires before a preliminary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases