1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 548 P.2d
  5. 548 P.2d 1329 (1976)
 

SMITH v. AMALGAMATED SUGAR COMPANY

548 P.2d 1329 (1976)

In the matter of the Compensation of Frank P. SMITH, Claimant. Frank P. Smith, Respondent-Cross-Appellant, v. The AMALGAMATED SUGAR COMPANY, Appellant-Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 26, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold Henigson, Nyssa, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent. With him on the briefs were Henigson, Stunz & Fonda, Nyssa.

Carl Burnham, Ontario, argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant. With him on the brief were Yturri, O'Kief, Rose & Burnham, Ontario.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and LANGTRY and FORT, JJ.

SCHWAB, Chief Judge.

Following a compensable injury to his wrist, claimant ultimately received a determination order in April 1973, awarding him 22.5 degrees permanent partial disability. Claimant experienced continuing pain and swelling in his wrist during the following months. In August 1973 claimant: (1) was examined by doctor who recommended surgery to relieve the pain; and (2) requested a hearing on the April determination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases