1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 26 Ariz.
  5. 26 Ariz. App. 154 (1976)
 

FRUTH v. DIVITO

No. 1 CA-CIV 2720.

26 Ariz. App. 154 (1976)

546 P.2d 1163

Dale G. FRUTH, a single man, and Goebel Realty, Inc., an Arizona Corporation, Appellants, v. Louis N. DIVITO and Doris Divito, his wife, and Kenneth D. Osborn and Judith Ann Osborn, his wife, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C.

Rehearing Denied April 21, 1976.

Review Denied May 11, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Biaett & Bahde, by Kenneth Biaett, Phoenix, for appellants.

Machmer, Schlosser & Meitz, Ltd., by Gerald A. Machmer, Phoenix, for appellees DiVito.

Skousen, McLaws & Skousen, P.C., by Richard E. Skousen, Mesa, for appellees Osborn.

OPINION

EUBANK, Judge.

This appeal presents the question whether certain defenses were raised sufficiently in advance of trial to have allowed them to be considered by the trial court when it directed a verdict in defendants' (appellees') favor.

The appellees, the DiVitos and the Osborns, owned certain contiguous parcels of undeveloped realty which they listed for sale exclusively with appellant Goebel Realty, Inc. The property was sold with the understanding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases