WRIGHT-AUSTIN CO. v. INTERN. U., UNITED AUTO., ETC.

Civ. A. No. 76-71533.

422 F.Supp. 1364 (1976)

WRIGHT-AUSTIN COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA and Local 212 of the International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Defendants.

United States District Court, E. D. Michigan, S. D.

November 22, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul H. Townsend, Jr., and Seth M. Lloyd, Dykema, Gossett, Spencer, Goodnow & Trigg, Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff.

William M. Mazey, Detroit, Mich., for defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KEITH, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, the Wright-Austin Company, has brought this action pursuant to Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, Title 29 U.S.C. Section 185, and the Declaratory Judgment Act, Title 28 U.S.C. Section 2201, seeking a declaratory judgment as to all defendants that the Opinion and Award of Arbitrator Alan Walt, entered on June 22, 1976, in the Matter of the Separation of Joseph Barrow, is null, void...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases