McGRAW-EDISON CO. v. ILHR DEPT.

Nos. 646, 647 (1974).

72 Wis.2d 99 (1976)

240 N.W.2d 148

McGRAW-EDISON COMPANY, Respondent, v. DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRY, LABOR & HUMAN RELATIONS, Appellant: SMITH and another, Defendants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided April 7, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant the cause was argued by James L. Pflasterer, attorney, with whom on the brief were Uclair W. Brandt, chief counsel, and David A. Pearson, assistant chief counsel.

For the respondent there was a brief by Walter S. Davis, John P. Savage and Davis, Kuelthau, Vergeront, Stover & Leichtfuss, S. C. of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Savage.


BEILFUSS, J.

The question before the circuit court and now before this court upon appeal is whether DILHR misconstrued the unemployment compensation statutes so as to grant unemployment compensation benefits to employees who have received lump-sum retirement benefits from a retirement fund provided for, in the main, by the employer.

Paul K. Smith and Donald Kunde were longtime employees of McGraw-Edison. On December 31, 1970, and May 31, 1972, respectively...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases