1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 546 P.2d
  5. 546 P.2d 1110 (1976)
 

MONGIOVI v. DOERNER

546 P.2d 1110 (1976)

Joe MONGIOVI, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. Ray E. DOERNER et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 8, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William A. Babcock, Springfield, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Babcock, Ackerman & Hanlon, Springfield.

Doyle L. Schiffman, Roseburg, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents. On the brief was Doug B. Gordon, Portland, for respondents Wolff, Zimmer, Gunsul & Frasca, dba Wolff, Zimmer, Gunsul and Frasca.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and FOLEY and LEE, JJ.

SCHWAB, Chief Judge.

The issues are: (1) what is a "new courthouse"; and (2) whether the hiring of professionals, such as architects, in connection with a public construction project is subject to statutory bidding and bonding requirements.

ORS 276.212 et seq. establish elaborate procedures to be followed before a county can construct a "new courthouse." Detailed published notice is required, ORS 276.712(2), 276.714, 276.716; a public hearing is required,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases