1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 546 P.2d
  5. 546 P.2d 1095 (1976)
 

STATE v. CHIN

546 P.2d 1095 (1976)

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Young Phillip CHIN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 15, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Agnes Marie Petersen, St. Helens, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were George G. VanNatta, and VanNatta & Petersen, St. Helens.

Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., and W. Michael Gillette, Solicitor Gen., Salem.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and FOLEY and FORT, JJ.

SCHWAB, Chief Judge.

Defendant, convicted upon trial by jury of driving under the influence of liquor, states in his brief on appeal that his "* * * only claim of error relates to a peculiarly horrible explanation of the concept of `reasonable doubt' given by the Court while instructing the jury."1

The court first instructed the jury that in order to return a verdict of guilty, it was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases