1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 553 P.2d
  5. 553 P.2d 1083 (1976)
 

CHISHOLM v. STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND

553 P.2d 1083 (1976)

26 Or.App. 627

In the matter of the Compensation of Jean CHISHOLM, Claimant, Respondent, v. STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 30, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin L. Mannix, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., and W. Michael Gillette, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Robert E. Martin, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and LANGTRY and FORT, JJ.

FORT, Judge.

This workmen's compensation case presents the question whether the 30-day time for appeal from a referee's order (ORS 656.289) begins to run from the date of the original order or from the date of an amendment to the first order made by the referee within the original 30-day period.

The Workmen's Compensation Board determined that the period ran from the date of the original order and thus it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. The circuit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases