SEIGAL v. MERRICK

Nos. 74 Civ. 2475, 74 Civ. 2630.

422 F.Supp. 1213 (1976)

David SEIGAL and Ethel Seigal, Plaintiffs, v. David MERRICK et al., Defendants. Harry GEHLER, Plaintiff, v. John P. EDMONDSON et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

March 11, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gold, Farrell & Marks by Martin R. Gold, Leonard M. Marks, Charles B. Orther, Eric Bregman, New York City, for plaintiffs Seigal.

Morris J. Levy, New York City, for plaintiff Gehler.

Rembar, Wolf & Curtis by Mortimer B. Wolf, Frank R. Curtis, New York City, for defendant Merrick.

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom by Robert W. Sweet, Thomas J. Schwarz, Douglas M. Kraus, New York City, for defendants Directors of Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.

Rosenman, Colin, Kaye, Petschek, Freund & Emil by Joseph Zuckerman, New York City, for defendant Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.


OPINION ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR OTHER RELIEF

MOTLEY, District Judge.

Defendants have moved to dismiss the complaints in these shareholders' derivative actions on the ground that 1) they fail to state a claim under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) they fail to plead the circumstances constituting the alleged fraud with particularity. Rules 12(b)(6), 9(b), Fed.R.Civ.P.

Alternatively, defendants seek a consolidation and stay of these...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases