MARSH v. BORING FURS, INC.


551 P.2d 1053 (1976)

Floyd R. MARSH, Appellant, v. BORING FURS, INC., an Oregon Corporation, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon, Department 2.

Decided July 15, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond R. Bagley, Jr., of Jack, Goodwin & Urbigkeit, Oregon City, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.

Phil H. Ringle, Jr., of Ringle & Herndon, Gladstone, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Paul D. Schultz of Hibbard, Caldwell, Canning, Bowerman & Schultz, Oregon City.

Before DENECKE, C.J., and O'CONNELL, HOLMAN and BRYSON, JJ.


O'CONNELL, Justice.

This is an action for the conversion of mink pens which plaintiff contends are personal property and which defendant contends are fixtures and therefore a part of the real property which he acquired as purchaser. The trial court entered a judgment in favor of defendant and plaintiff appeals.

The pens or cages in question and the sheds which house them were used in the operation of the Marsh farm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases