EATHERLY v. OREGON STATE CORR. INST.


544 P.2d 1053 (1976)

Wayne EATHERLY, Petitioner, v. OREGON STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Personnel Division, and James A. Ward, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 12, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory A. Hartman, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Willner, Bennett, Riggs & Skarstad and James B. Kenin, Portland.

John W. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., and W. Michael Gillette, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and LANGTRY and FORT, JJ.


FORT, Judge.

A new position entitled ombudsman was created at the Oregon State Correctional Institution. In accordance with the Oregon merit system law, ORS ch. 240, procedures were instituted by the Corrections Division of the Department of Human Resources to fill the position, which was classified as Administrative Assistant 3 (Ombudsman). Petitioner was one of eight successful applicants who passed the test administered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases